Mao Tze-Tung once famously declared that power comes from the barrel of a gun. He was wrong. Power comes from communication. One person can, after all, wield only one or at most two guns at a time, which is seldom enough for those weapons to give him any real power. If Mao himself had been unable to communicate effectively, no one would have wielded any guns on his behalf, and he would never have prevailed against either the Japanese or the Kuomintang.
Power comes from the ability to communicate. With the rise of the Internet and, especially, of social media networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, the ability to communicate has become more and more decentralized. As that happens, power is decentralized as well, with the result that central authority on all levels of society – religious, business, and social as well as governmental – is breaking down.
The old model of communication involves a single speaker whose words and ideas are communicated to many listeners. This is the model employed by the printing press and broadcast media alike. A newspaper communicates the words of its writers and editors, and those of others that the writers and editors see fit to quote, to all of the readers. A similar model prevails in broadcast media. A radio or television show communicates the words of its writers and producers spoken by on-screen or on-air personalities, along with those whom the show’s producers deem worthy of being filmed or reported. Always leaders in various walks of life, political, business, religious, and social, are communicated, but most people have no access to the tools of communication. The model is like a wheel with a single hub doing the communicating to all points on the rim.
This model supports central authority. The government’s words are communicated effectively, but those of critics of the government are not, except those of the “official” opposition represented by the opposing political party or parties, who are themselves part of the authority structure of the state. The same is true in areas of life outside politics.
But social media follow a different model. Anyone can publish a page on Facebook or a compact Tweet or a YouTube video. Communication being the medium of power, power has passed from concentration in the hands of a few to dispersal among the many. We are only beginning to see the consequences of this transformation. Already the ability to mount an effective protest campaign has increased dramatically, along with the ability to compel business activity through threat of a boycott. Several governments have been toppled, literally, by means of Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. Religious leaders decline in their ability to command obedience. In the words of W.B. Yeats, “Things fall apart, the center cannot hold.” Will mere anarchy be loosed upon the world? Or will we find new ways to achieve order without central authority?
Today, the social media has totally become powerful that it has effectively bypassed some important things in the less electronic world such as the power of authority. Learn more about this at http://www.findermind.com.
Latest Videos of Social Media and the Decline of Authority: